Thursday, August 14, 2014

To Those Who Have Read
the Notes On This Website:

An Opportunity
For Individualized Teaching


I have waited desperately for some rabbis to respond positively to the note that I wrote on this website last Friday:

http://unsealing-the-seven-seals.blogspot.com/2014/08/disclaimer-icertainly-hope-that-rabbis.html ,

in order that they might turn again to the Truth; in order that the Truth might thereby be more widely publicized; and that, as a result, there might be even a slight reduction in the suffering and bloodshed of the coming “time of trouble” Prophesied by Daniel.

But, to my knowledge, there is not even so much as one rabbi—nor, to my knowledge, even so much as one Jewish, Christian or Muslim religious official on the face of this entire planet (although I sincerely hope to be proven wrong)—who cares at all about the Truth; who cares about seriously diminishing the violence and bloodshed in the Middle East; or who cares about the Knowledge that has been Revealed over the past four thousand years to those individuals who have, as I have, personally received the Vision of the “Son of man” and the Revelation of “the resurrection”.

So, out of desperate financial necessity, I have no choice but to turn to those who have read the notes on my websites, or who have listened to the videos on my 4Q529 YouTube channel—and to any others who, perhaps surprisingly, have discovered that they are simply not satisfied with what they have been told to date by their monotheistic religious officials, and who recognize that there is something fundamentally lacking in their teaching—to ask whether there are any among them who are not only genuinely interested in the Truth:

The Truth about the Thanksgiving Hymns of the Dead Sea Scrolls (which I have researched for more than 40 years); but which, however, has yet to be publicized in any of the books, journal articles, or other writings of the ‘official’ Dead Sea Scrolls researchers...

The Truth about the Teaching of Jesus, as conveyed in at least some of the writings found at Nag Hammadi, Egypt—for example, the Treatise On the Resurrection, the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Truth, and the Gospel of Mary (which I have researched for more than 38 years)but which has also been censored and suppressed by the academic, mainstream and ‘alternative’ media in order to preserve the economic interests of the monotheistic religious establishment...

And the Truth about the three dimensions of human consciousness, as explained at:



But, also—importantly—would be willing to make a donation in order to receive, over Skype, an individualized, detailed and more personally relevant explanation of the Knowledge that has been Revealed through these Revelations.

Over the past 38 years, I have held quite rigidly to the principle that the Teaching must not be exchanged for money; that the payment of money cannot be made a requirement for the receiving of the Teaching. And I have also spent thousands and tens of thousands of dollars in my efforts to inform others of the Knowledge that has been Revealed to me, fully aware that the acknowledgment of Revealed Truth is absolutely crucial to the preservation of human life. (“My people perish for lack of Knowledge.”)

But, as the bloodshed in the Middle East has only increased over this time—while many thousands of the monotheistic religious officials have, simultaneously, quite easily made either tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars each year in the effective marketing of their teaching—my financial situation has only drastically deteriorated.

And, although reading the notes on my websites—and/or listening to the videos on my 4Q529 YouTube channel—may very well provide a general introduction as well as a detailed explanation of at least part of the Knowledge Revealed through these Revelations, much of that information is of no immediate
personal relevance to those who read it. And it is only through an individualized Teaching, and a close interaction between the teacher and the student (see, for example, Saying #13 in the Gospel of Thomas) that a person can be made aware of that Knowledge which is specifically, immediately and personally relevant to their own individual spiritual development and transformation of consciousness.

Thus, anyone interested in receiving over Skype an individualized and detailed Teaching concerning the Knowledge that has been Revealed through these Revelations (this Knowledge is sharply different than what some ‘popularizes’ of the Kabbalah have charged thousands of dollars for, thereby enriching themselves) should contact me at mececil@att.net (with the subject line reading “Individualized Teaching) providing:

1) their name and age (the Teaching given to a 45 year-old is sharply different than the Teaching given to an 18 year-old)

2) their religious, philosophical, and/or scientific background; and,

3) their principal area of interest [for example, the monotheistic Revelations (including the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Nag Hammadi Codices, or Jewish mysticism); the Eastern esoteric perspective (including the teaching of, for example, J. Krishnamurti); or issues of philosophy, psychology and consciousness (as touched on in Towards A New Paradigm of Consciousness)].

Michael Cecil

Friday, November 22, 2013

Commentaries
On the Teaching of Jesus
And the Psychology of Revelation*

1) “On the day when you were one you became two.” (From Saying #11 in the Gospel of Thomas)
Commentary:
The first phrase of this statement (i.e., “when you were one”) originates in the Revelation of the Memory of Creation (Chapter 2, verse 7 of Genesis; also echoed, interestingly enough, in Psalm 2, verse 7), which conveys a Knowledge of the non-dualistic” consciousness with which man was Created by God, also referred to in The Treatise On Resurrection as the “spiritual” resurrection. While the second phrase of this statement (i.e., “you became two”) originates in the Revelation of the Memory of ‘the Fall’ (both of which, together with the revelation of the memories of previous lives, referred to in The Treatise On Resurrection as the “psychic” resurrection, comprise the Revelation of “the resurrection”) into the dualistic consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’.
The problem, however, is that the same word (“you”) cannot unambiguously be used to convey two not merely different, but precisely antithetical meanings; the word “you” in the first phrase having a sharply different ‘meaning’ than the word “you” in the second phrase. In fact, it is simply not even possible to ‘personify’ or ‘localize’ the non-dualistic consciousness with which man was Created by God into a ‘spatiality’ of consciousness (i.e., a “you”) in the first place—in other words, as the dualistic consciousness of a “self” and a ‘thinker’—because those dualistic dimensions of consciousness exist only after rather than before ‘the Fall’.
Thus, more precisely in accordance with the Knowledge Revealed through the Revelations that Jesus received:
Before ‘the Fall’ there exists a non-dualistic consciousness. After ‘the Fall’ there exists the consciousness of duality; that is, a “beast of the sea” consciousness of the “self” and a “beast of the earth” consciousness of the ‘thinker’.
And, although a direct experience of the non-dualistic consciousness Created by God is received through the Revelation of the Memory of Creation, the reality of ‘the Fall’ into the dualistic consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’ cannot be irreversibly reversed to that non-dualistic consciousness itself. In other words, the differentiation into individual “selves” and ‘thinkers’ is an inescapable—and irreversible in the space-time reality—consequence of ‘the Fall’; both the consciousness of the “self” and the consciousness of the ‘thinker’ being required for living successfully in the space-time reality.
2) “You a teacher in Israel and you do not know these things?...I tell you most solemnly, we speak only about what we know and witness only to what we have seen and yet you people reject our evidence.” (Chapter 3, verses 10…11 of the Gospel of John)
Commentary:
The word “we” in this passage refers to Jesus and the prophets who came before him (for example, Moses, Isaiah, Ezekiel and Daniel) who had received both the Vision of the “Son of man”/“Tree of Life” (Chapter 3, verse 24 of Genesis) ( i.e., “we…witness only to what we have seen”); the Revelation of “the resurrection”; and the Knowledge Revealed through those Revelations (i.e., “we speak only about what we know”)—such Revelations being considered as evidence by those who receive them; evidence which, however, is typically not acknowledged by the monotheistic religious ‘authorities’.
The term “you people” refers not to the children of Israel as a whole, but to the aforementioned ‘teachers in Israel’; those Jewish religious ‘authorities’ who had no direct experience or Knowledge of the Revelation of Truth, but who claimed to ‘understand’ those Revelations (and were paid for that ‘understanding’) from the frame of reference of the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’; which, of course, is both the job description of all Jewish, Christian and Muslim religious ‘authorities’, and the reason why they are still paid to this day—that is, for substituting the doctrines of men originating in the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness for the original Revelations.
3) “No one has [gone up into] heaven except the one who [came down] from heaven, the Son of man who is in heaven.” (Chapter 3, verse 13 of the Gospel of John)
Commentary:
What is being poetically described here is the actual experience of the receiving of the Vision of the “Son of man”; although there is, in fact, no literal—that is, spatial—‘going  up’ and no literal or spatial ‘coming down from heaven’. (But the implication that there is some kind of ‘movement in space’ with the receiving of the Vision of the “Son of man” is also a characteristic of the “Night Journey” of Mohammed mentioned in the Quran; although, according to his wife Khadija, “The prophet’s body did not move.”)
In addition, the Vision of the “Son of man” is not a “one” or a “who” in the first place—that is, there cannot be any ‘personification’ of that Vision into any ‘spatiality’ of consciousness any more than there can be a ‘spatialization’ of the non-dualistic consciousness Created by God—but, rather, consists of the Revelation of Knowledge without any trace of the ‘spatiality’ of consciousness referred to as either a “self” or a ‘thinker”; i.e., a “who”.
4) C.S. Lewis once argued—arrogantly, viciously, witlessly and infamously, I would suggest—that Jesus was either a lunatic, a “demon” or ‘God’.
In fact, rather than saying anything at all about Jesus, such a formulation is, instead, a graphic representation of ‘the Fall’ from the consciousness Created by God; consisting of an instantaneous, reflexive shift of attention away from what Jesus taught—that the Doctrine of “resurrection” is a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’, for example—to who Jesus was; due, at least in part, to the statement by Jesus (or purportedly by Jesus) that:
“I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (Chapter 14, verse 6 of the Gospel of John)
Commentary:
In affirmation of the Knowledge Revealed through the Vision of the “Son of man”, it should be understood that the phonetic tones (in English) of this particular passage originate in the Knowledge of the Ten Principal Phonetic Tones of Creation (arranged along the Seven Churches, or ‘chakras’, in a geometry ‘approximating’ the Kabbalist “Tree of Life”) Revealed through that Vision; the Long A phonetic tone of the “Way” signifying the Revelation of “the resurrection” (which is received in the Fourth Church or the ‘heart chakra’); the Long I phonetic tone of the “Life” signifying the Vision of the “Son of man”/“Tree of Life” (which, radically simplified, is ‘received’ in the Seventh Church or the ‘forehead chakra’); and the Long U phonetic tone of the “Truth” signifying the Revelation of the Law (which, radically simplified, corresponds to what is signified by the First Church or the ‘genital chakra’; for reasons which, however, are most effectively explained in an oral Teaching).
The fundamental and fatal error of this passage, however—and it is not a merely trivial error, but an error which has importantly been utilized by Christian theologians to turn the Teaching of Jesus upside down by, purportedly, ‘validating’ the Satanic idolatrization of Jesus as ‘God’ and the ‘only’ path to the Truth—is, very specifically, the use of the pronouns “I” and “we”; any such use of which consisting of, in fact, a sharp (but generally perceived as subtle) deviation from the Knowledge Revealed through the Vision of the “Son of man”.
More in conformity with the Knowledge Revealed through what Jesus referred to in the Thanksgiving Hymns of the Dead Sea Scrolls as the “Vision of Knowledge”, then, the pronouns “I” and “me” when spoken by a human can only refer to a particular ‘spatiality’ of consciousness; that is, to a ‘fallen’ “self” and a ‘thinker’. Thus, to use these terms self-referentially in relation to Revealed Knowledge itself—in other words, to claim to actually be the very ‘personification’ of that Knowledge—establishes, in fact, a thoroughly delusional but absolute ‘equivalence’ between the non-dualistic consciousness Created by God and the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’; which, in fact, is equivalent to the assertion that the consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’ have been Created by God; when, in reality, they are self-created, as explained in detail in Towards A New Paradigm of Consciousness.
Thus, in opposition to the idolatrization of Jesus as ‘God’ that has become manifest in the doctrines of Christianity over the past almost two thousand years since this statement was first made—or purportedly made—by Jesus, this passage must be updated and clarified.
Three things are necessary for the understanding of Truth:
1) A rigorous adherence to the Moral Law (also referred to as the First Phase of the War of the Sons of Light (the “Truth”);
2) the receiving of the Knowledge Revealed through the Revelation of the Memory of Creation (the “Way”), the Revelation of the Memory of ‘the Fall’ into the dualistic consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’, and the revelation of the memories of previous lives (also referred to as the Second Phase of the War of the Sons of Light); and,
3) the receiving of the Knowledge Revealed through the Vision of the “Son of man” (the “Life”), also referred to as the Third Phase of the War of the Sons of Light.
And, while a person who has received these Revelations can be understood as being, in some way, a representation or a ‘manifestation’ of such Knowledge, it is simply not in any way possible for anyone ever to be the ‘personification’ of the Knowledge of Truth; or for such a person to constitute the ‘only’ path to the Truth.

5) “…and in front of the garden of Eden He posted the cherubs, and the flame of a flashing sword, to guard the Way to the Tree of Life. “ (Genesis Chapter 3, verse 24)
“As high as the heavens are above the earth are My Ways above your ways…” (Chapter 55, verse 9 of the Book of Isaiah)
“Of the Vision of Knowledge, they {that is, the religious ‘authorities’ in Jerusalem} say, ‘It is unsure.’ And, of the Way of Thy heart, ‘It is not the Way.’” (from the Thanksgiving Hymns of the Dead Sea Scrolls, written by Jesus)
“[…And, when the hearts of the detach]ments of foot-soldiers faint {Long A phonetic tone}, then shall the Might of God fortify [the hearts of the Sons of Light]. And, with the seventh lot, the Mighty hand of God shall bring down [the army of Satan, and all] the angels of his kingdom, and all the members [of his company in everlasting destruction]… (from Column I of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light)
“I am the Way…” (Chapter 14, verse 6 of the Gospel of John)
Commentary:
The phrase “to guard the Way to the Tree of Life” conveys the sequence of the Revelations from the Second Phase of the War of the Sons of Light—that is, the Revelation of “the resurrection” (which is received in the Fourth Church or the ‘heart chakra’)—to the Third Phase of the War of the Sons of Light—that is, the Vision of the “Son of man”/“Night Journey”/“sidrah tree” (the culmination of that Vision occurring at the Seventh Church or the ‘forehead chakra’).
(To be continued, Insh’allah.)
*This is intended to be a third part of a trilogy on consciousness; the first part consisting of Meditations On a Science of Consciousness:
and the second part consisting of Towards A New Paradigm of Consciousness:

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Report of A Macroscopic Time-Reversal...
And Its Relevance to Revelation*

Dear Sir,

You’re not going to believe this.

Why not?

Because I am the one who experienced this and even I don’t believe it.

But, no matter how many times I replay this experience in my memory from several weeks ago, I cannot deny that it happened; nor can I make any sense of it at all in terms of the ‘normal’ progression of time in accordance with only one temporal frame of reference.

First, a little background:

My usual exercise routine requires that I run for approximately 2 blocks, then walk for approximately 6 blocks, then run for approximately 1½-2 miles back to the place where I started; something that variably takes between 30 and 38 minutes.

Secondly, there is nothing wrong with my watch.

But this is what happened:

I left on my run at precisely—I waited until the second hand hit the 12 on my watch—5 minutes til the hour (that is, 55 minutes after the previous hour) and ran for approximately 2 blocks. After walking about 5 blocks, I looked at my watch and it showed 44 minutes after the previous hour; that is, 11 minutes before I started; something that, possibly, in some way, is related to the event recorded in the following video:


I continued to walk for 1 more block, then ran approximately half of the 1½-2 miles at the end of my exercise. But, when I looked at my watch, it had taken me 11 minutes to cover that distance, and I arrived at 5 minutes til the hour; that is, precisely the same time that I had started my exercise.

It then took me 33 minutes—when I looked at my watch it was 28 minutes after the next hour—to complete the remaining ¾-1 mile back to where I had started; which, altogether, is within the normal time of my exercise.

I have gone several times through the possible explanations and have eliminated each one of them time after time:

1) there is NO possible way that it would have taken me 49 minutes (from 5 minutes til the hour to 44 minutes after that same hour) to run approximately 2 blocks and walk for another 5 blocks; in other words, I did not make any mistakes when looking, 3 separate times, at the minute hand on my watch—it was at 55 minutes and, then, 44 minutes after the same hour; and, then, 28 minutes after the next hour (it is unlikely that reading that two or three times will help in its understanding); and,

2) it is simply not possible that I ran for 2 blocks, walked for 6 blocks and, then, ran for about ¾ to 1 mile in either NO time, or a time-reversal to the time that I started.

But that is what happened.

Now, do I have a theoretical explanation of what happened here?

Of course I do.

As I have set out in Towards A New Paradigm of Consciousness:


there is a dimension of consciousness in which time not only stands still; but, also, can go backwards.

But all kinds of things occur at the quantum level which do not occur at the macroscopic level; so, is it even possible that this example of time-reversal and, then, time ‘standing still’ can be manifested at the macroscopic level, in confirmation of at least some of the findings, at the microscopic level, of Time Symmetrical Quantum Mechanics?

Certainly, not to my knowledge.

And, yet, this is precisely what seems to have occurred here.

[Nor have I had any further ‘problems’ with my watch since this occurred; any possible ‘message’ apparently having been effectively conveyed—which at least suggests that, in flagrant violation of one of the fundamental rules of the scientific method, observations of the ‘fluidity’ of time are intrinsically irreproducible (but, apparently, they can be recorded on video?); existing within a larger category of events which also includes Reverse Speech Analysis (which clearly demonstrates that information comes backwards in time from the future), laboratory experiments demonstrating pre-cognition in humans (and pre-sentience to electrical shock in worms), ‘psychic’ impressions of future events (for example, the prediction of the headline regarding the sinking of the Titanic), as well as what are commonly referred to as “Miracles” (such as the plagues upon Egypt, water emerging from a rock after it has been struck, the collapse of the walls of Jericho, or the multiplication of loaves and fishes)]

Any ‘theoretical’ explanation you might be able to provide will be entertained.

But I would remind you that I looked at my watch at each of these times and am merely reporting what I observed; which, as I understand it, is what scientists do.

So, do I really believe that any of this really happened?

Of course not.

According to the time-based consciousness of the ‘thinker’, it is simply not possible.

This information defies the very structure of that consciousness (as well as belief) itself, which depends upon time moving smoothly only in a forward direction; and, importantly, in accordance with only one temporal frame of reference. (But maybe one of the principal goals of the graphic representations of the movements of the “agents” and Neo in The Matrix was to gradually ‘free people’s minds’ from the belief that time is a dimension of reality independent of the consciousness of the ‘thinker’—as an “agent” cop says early in The Matrix in response to a jump by Trinity, “That’s impossible”—and to gradually introduce this civilization to the concept of independent temporal frames of reference based upon consciousness.)

But I do remember looking at my watch; I remember what those numbers were; and I do remember it happening just as I have described it.

But of what relevance is all of this to Revelation?

It is simply not possible for the dualistic, time-based consciousness of the ‘thinker’ to fully grasp the reality of either previous or future lives; the reason being that the revelation of the memories of previous lives—that is, the realities experienced by previous “selves” and ‘thinkers’—are intrinsically incapable of being experienced by any particular consciousness of the “self” localized to a particular body living at a particular time; but only from a frame of reference, in terms of consciousness, ‘outside of’ and ‘prior to’ the existence of that body and that “self”; that is, the non-dualistic, non-temporal, 2-dimensional ‘flat space’ “observing consciousness” (of the Eastern esoteric traditions) Created ‘by and in the image of God’ (of the monotheistic Revelations but not theologies).

Translation: Western civilization’s more or less universal disregard of the reality of previous and future lives—because that reality exists outside the frame of reference defined as reality by the “beast of the sea” consciousness of the “self” and the “beast of the earth” consciousness of the ‘thinker’—is very directly tied to the comparative lack of knowledge (because of censorship) of the reality of the three dimensions of human consciousness; in other words, the censorship of the fact that there is a consciousness and a reality which are independent of the ‘fallen’ consciousness of the “self” and ‘thinker’.

And, thus, those responsible for censoring this (K)nowledge about human consciousness bear a responsibility for the bloodshed and suffering of the coming “time of trouble” equal to those officials of the “dragon”-media and those “false prophet” Jewish, Christian and Muslim religious ‘authorities’ who are censoring, ignoring, ridiculing, denying and contradicting the Truth about the Doctrine of “resurrection”.


Michael



*The Revelation of the Memory of Creation is preceded by a sharp and traumatic break (the “shattering of the vessels”) with time as experienced by “selves” and ‘thinkers’; and consists, of course, of a literal time-reversal to not merely the origin of time itself; but to the very origin of the ‘spatiality’ of the (“beast of the sea”) consciousness of the “self” which precedes both the origin of time and the (“beast of the earth”) consciousness of the ‘thinker’. In other words, the Revelation of the Memory of Creation also consists of the Revelation of the Memory of ‘the Fall’ into the dualistic consciousness of the “self” and ‘thinker’. And, for that reason, it is a wordless Revelation; although, by means of a previous time-reversal (the Third rather than the Second Phase of the War of the Sons of Light), Knowledge has already been received (but not yet ‘remembered’) of the Ten Principal Phonetic Tones of Creation (and the Knowledge conveyed by those tones).

The revelation of the memories of previous lives, on the other hand—that is, the revelation of what has been experienced by “selves” and ‘thinkers’ prior to the present “self” and ‘thinker’—consists of a time-reversal to a time either hundreds or thousands of years before the present time (parallel to the time-reversal from 55 to 44 in the above report), which is then followed by a progression of time in a forward direction (parallel to the forward movement of time from 44 to 55—and, 33 minutes later, to 28—in the above report) through those experiences in precisely the same way they were first experienced; that is, without any knowledge of either future time or future experiences of other “selves” and ‘thinkers’. In other words, a ‘memory’ of a previous life does not perfectly fit the definition of a memory as experienced, or defined, by a “self” or a ‘thinker’. That is, one does not really ‘remember’ what those previous “selves” and ‘thinkers’ have experienced. Rather, it is the re-experience of those experiences in precisely the same way that they were originally experienced that is ‘remembered’.

It is also interesting to note that the time-reversal in the above report occurred between :55 and :44, the forward progression of time was for 11 and, then, 33 minutes; and that the time stamp on the CCTV video linked above of the sharp discontinuity of time occurred at 3:33; which numbers are of specific relevance to the Ten Principal Phonetic Tones of Creation conveyed by the “Tree of Life” (“sidrah tree” in the Quran)/the Vision of the “Son of man”/ the “Vision of Knowledge” (the Thanksgiving Hymns of the Dead Sea Scrolls/the “Night Journey” of Mohammed as represented by the YouTube video “Stargate Sequence” from 2001—A Space Odyssey.

Footnote added at 333  October 21 (7+7+7), 2013

 


Thursday, October 17, 2013

WHY the Censorship?

Look.

If the folks at rense.com are willing to publish the link to:


WHY, at the same time, are they unwilling to publish the link to:


(And WHY should someone trying to explain this Knowledge be banned from the Above Top Secret, Before It’s News and Godlike Productions websites?)

It is the censorship of both scientific knowledge as well as the Knowledge of the three dimensions of consciousness—as Revealed by and through the Vision of the “Son of man” (the “Tree of Life” and the “Night Journey”) and the Revelation of “the resurrection”—that has resulted in immeasurable suffering and loss of human life.

But, even if such scientific knowledge is finally becoming more widely known, the civilization which is made aware of this knowledge may very well annihilate itself unless the Knowledge Revealed about human consciousness—and the reality of previous lives—is not merely publicized, but directly applied to the resolution of the religious-political conflicts (especially in the Middle East) presently threatening the very survival of human civilization itself…

Something which I have been attempting, without success, to do for the past 37 years.


Michael

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

I Hope You Understand
What You’re Reading

If Moses were alive today, he would not have written Chapter 3 of Genesis.

Inasmuch as this is the time for the Revelations finally to be made known and ‘unsealed’, in accordance with the Prophecy in Chapter 12, verse 9 of the Book of Daniel; and, inasmuch as Moses received both the Vision of the “Son of man” (referred to in Chapter 3, verse 24 of Genesis as the “Tree of Life”) and the Revelation which would later be referred to as the Revelation of “the resurrection”…

He would, instead, have written a more detailed explanation of the differentiation between the consciousness Created by God and the ‘fallen’ consciousness:

http://science-of-consciousness.blogspot.com/2011/04/towards-new-paradigm-of-consciousness-i.html

Michael

Thursday, March 28, 2013

On the Warfare
of Consciousness and Knowledge

The ‘war in heaven between Michael and his angels and the dragon and his angels’ is a war at the level of consciousness and Knowledge; a War of the Sons of Light and the Sons of Darkness; a war between the non-dualistic consciousness Created by God and the dualistic consciousness of the “self” (or the “ego”—symbolized by the “beast of the sea”), and the ‘thinker’ (symbolized by the “beast of the earth”); a war between the Knowledge received through Revelation and the knowledge (images and thoughts) of the dualistic consciousness.

The Knowledge of Revelation consists of the Knowledge Revealed through the Vision of the “Son of man”, the Revelation of the Memory of Creation, the Revelation of the Memory of ‘the Fall’ into the dualistic consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’, and the revelation of the memories of previous lives.

The knowledge of the “self” consists of sensations and perceptions of, as well as behaviors within the space-time physical reality; memories and images of those sensations, perceptions and behaviors; and emotions associated with the formation, expansion and shattering of the images of the ‘spatiality’ of the consciousness of the “self” (referred to by Jewish mystics as the ‘shattering of the vessels’); whereas the knowledge of the ‘thinker’ consists of logic, the scientific method and other repeatable and verifiable evidence-based descriptions of the space-time reality.

Knowledge conveyed by the “Vision of Knowledge”, the “Tree of Life”, the “Night Journey” and the Revelation of “the resurrection”, because it is both non-spatial and non-temporal—that is, does not originate in either the ‘movement’ of self-reflection, the postulation of the thought of the ‘thinker’, or sensations and perceptions of the space-time reality—shatters the images of the ‘spatiality’ of the consciousness of the “self”, while stopping the ‘time’ of the consciousness of the ‘thinker’ (thus, the significance of the phrase in Chapter 12, verse 9 of the Book of Daniel “At the time of the End…”; and the phrase in Chapter 10, verse 7 of the Revelation of John “Time will be no longer…”; mistranslated in the Jerusalem Bible as “The time of waiting is over…”).

In other words, the confrontation between the Knowledge conveyed by Revelation and the dualistic consciousness is an annihilating conflict; as signified by the opening of the Sixth Seal, which symbolizes the annihilation of the ‘fallen’ consciousness, prior to the opening of the Seventh Seal, which symbolizes the receiving of the Vision of the “Son of man” itself.

And, because it “knows that its time is short”—or “its days are numbered” (with numbers specifically mentioned in both the Book of Daniel and the Revelation of John, the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness of the “self” denies Revealed Knowledge on the basis of images of ‘spatiality’, which it considers evidentiary (the Sadduceean perspective); whereas the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness of the ‘thinker’ contradicts Revealed Knowledge on the basis of the thoughts of the ‘thinker’ (the Pharisaical perspective), whose goal is nothing more than self-preservation of the dualistic consciousness against annihilation.

For example, in response to descriptions of the revelation of the memories of previous lives conveyed by the non-dualistic consciousness—that is, not consisting of images of the “self”—(Chapter  26, verse 19 of the Book of Isaiah Chapter 27, verses 52-53 of the Gospel of Matthew and Chapter 20, verses 34-36 of the Gospel of Luke) the consciousness of the “self” projects images of ‘spatiality’, solely for reasons of self-preservation, consisting of images of dead bodies arising from the grave; whereas, such images, being ephemeral and transitory—and, thus, inherently unreliable and unstable—the consciousness of the ‘thinker’ then expropriates metaphysical philosophy for the purpose of preserving those images and that ‘spatiality’ of consciousness by means of doctrine.

Being unable to form an effective image of the consciousness Created by God—the formation of images being crucial to the preservation of the consciousness of the “self”—and the consciousness of the ‘thinker’ being incapable of apprehending the Knowledge conveyed by that consciousness—the most common response of the ‘fallen’ consciousness is simply to deny the Message altogether; and to focus, instead, upon the messenger, resulting in the projection of images of evil and accusations of evil based upon images whose only goal is to preserve that ‘fallen’ consciousness at any cost; images and accusations of evil which are merely a prelude to violence.

It is that reaction, multiplied hundreds of millions of times, that will result in the “time of trouble” Prophesied by Daniel.

Michael

Sunday, February 24, 2013